• DocumentCode
    2001035
  • Title

    Finite element analysis and Preisach hysteresis model of a toroid compared to measurements

  • Author

    Vrijsen, N.H. ; Jansen, J.W. ; Lomonova, E.A.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Electr. Eng., Eindhoven Univ. of Technol., Eindhoven, Netherlands
  • fYear
    2012
  • fDate
    15-20 Sept. 2012
  • Firstpage
    3379
  • Lastpage
    3386
  • Abstract
    Two methods predicting magnetic hysteresis effects are compared to measurements on a closed and open toroid. The soft-magnetic laminated toroids are simulated with a 3-dimensional finite element method (3D-FEM) and the classical Preisach model (CPM). On the closed toroid a direct comparison between both models has been made and the CPM shows better agreement with the measurements, especially at low excitation field strengths. In the open toroid with a 1.0 millimeter airgap, it is shown that the prediction and measurement of the magnetic flux density in the airgap are strongly influenced by leakage and fringing fluxes. Nevertheless, both predictive methods show reasonable agreement with the preformed measurements.
  • Keywords
    air gaps; finite element analysis; laminations; magnetic flux; magnetic hysteresis; soft magnetic materials; 3D finite element analysis; Preisach hysteresis model; air gap; classical Preisach model; closed toroid; excitation field strengths; fringing fluxes; magnetic flux; magnetic hysteresis effects; open toroid; soft magnetic laminated toroids; Atmospheric modeling; Distribution functions; Finite element methods; Magnetic cores; Magnetic hysteresis; Mathematical model; Toroidal magnetic fields;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), 2012 IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    Raleigh, NC
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4673-0802-1
  • Electronic_ISBN
    978-1-4673-0801-4
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ECCE.2012.6342497
  • Filename
    6342497