DocumentCode
2001035
Title
Finite element analysis and Preisach hysteresis model of a toroid compared to measurements
Author
Vrijsen, N.H. ; Jansen, J.W. ; Lomonova, E.A.
Author_Institution
Dept. of Electr. Eng., Eindhoven Univ. of Technol., Eindhoven, Netherlands
fYear
2012
fDate
15-20 Sept. 2012
Firstpage
3379
Lastpage
3386
Abstract
Two methods predicting magnetic hysteresis effects are compared to measurements on a closed and open toroid. The soft-magnetic laminated toroids are simulated with a 3-dimensional finite element method (3D-FEM) and the classical Preisach model (CPM). On the closed toroid a direct comparison between both models has been made and the CPM shows better agreement with the measurements, especially at low excitation field strengths. In the open toroid with a 1.0 millimeter airgap, it is shown that the prediction and measurement of the magnetic flux density in the airgap are strongly influenced by leakage and fringing fluxes. Nevertheless, both predictive methods show reasonable agreement with the preformed measurements.
Keywords
air gaps; finite element analysis; laminations; magnetic flux; magnetic hysteresis; soft magnetic materials; 3D finite element analysis; Preisach hysteresis model; air gap; classical Preisach model; closed toroid; excitation field strengths; fringing fluxes; magnetic flux; magnetic hysteresis effects; open toroid; soft magnetic laminated toroids; Atmospheric modeling; Distribution functions; Finite element methods; Magnetic cores; Magnetic hysteresis; Mathematical model; Toroidal magnetic fields;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), 2012 IEEE
Conference_Location
Raleigh, NC
Print_ISBN
978-1-4673-0802-1
Electronic_ISBN
978-1-4673-0801-4
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ECCE.2012.6342497
Filename
6342497
Link To Document