Can you beat treewidth?

It is well-known that constraint satisfaction problems (CSP) can be solved in time n^O(k) if the treewidth of the primal graph of the instance is at most k and n is the size of the input. We show that no algorithm can be significantly better than this treewidth-based algorithm, even if we restrict the problem to some special class of primal graphs. Formally, let g be an arbitrary class of graphs and assume that there is an algorithm A solving binary CSP for instances whose primal graph is in g. We prove that if the running lime of A is f(G)n^O(k/logk), where k is the treewidth of the primal graph G and f is an arbitrary function, then the Exponential Time Hypothesis fails. We prove the result also in the more general framework of the homomorphism problem for bounded-arity relational structures. For this problem, the treewidth of the core of the left-hand side structure plays the same role as the. treewidth of the primal graph above.