• DocumentCode
    2226162
  • Title

    Effect of selection operator on NSGA-III in single, multi, and many-objective optimization

  • Author

    Seada, Haitham ; Deb, Kalyanmoy

  • Author_Institution
    Computational Optimization and Innovation (COIN) Laboratory, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
  • fYear
    2015
  • fDate
    25-28 May 2015
  • Firstpage
    2915
  • Lastpage
    2922
  • Abstract
    Decomposition-based elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-III) is a recently proposed many-objective optimization algorithm that uses multiple pre-defined yet adaptable reference directions to maintain diversity among its solutions. Designing to solve specifically many-objective problems having four or more objectives, the authors of NSGA-III restricted the population size to be equal to the number of chosen reference directions. This restriction hinders the usage of NSGA-III to single-objective optimization problems, where, by definition, there is only one reference direction. For this reason, a unified algorithm — U-NSGA-III — has been recently proposed to handle this issue. U-NSGA-III is capable of adapting automatically to the dimensionality of the problem in hand through its niching based selection operator. However, the authors of U-NSGA-III abided by this single-fold restriction in all NSGA-III simulations of their study. In this paper we test the possibility of ignoring this restriction of NSGA-III and use multiple population folds to solve single, multi and many-objective problems. Simulations are performed on a variety of constrained and unconstrained single, multi and many-objective problems for this purpose. The strengths and weaknesses of multi-fold NSGA-III compared to those of U-NSGA-III are thoroughly investigated here. The robustness of NSGA-III in each type of problems is also discussed. This study provides a more comprehensive evaluation of the original NSGA-III procedure, which seems to have a wider scope than the original study had foreseen.
  • Keywords
    Algorithm design and analysis; Convergence; Evolutionary computation; Optimization; Sociology; Sorting; Statistics;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Evolutionary Computation (CEC), 2015 IEEE Congress on
  • Conference_Location
    Sendai, Japan
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/CEC.2015.7257251
  • Filename
    7257251