• DocumentCode
    2379475
  • Title

    Wireless SOC testing: Can RF testing costs be reduced?

  • Author

    Kafton, Alan

  • Author_Institution
    Wireless Semicond. Test Solutions, Agilent Technol., Santa Rosa, CA, USA
  • fYear
    2002
  • fDate
    2002
  • Firstpage
    1226
  • Abstract
    Emerging wireless SOCs and SiPs are highly integrated devices containing logic, analog, RF, and even memory blocks. From a pure "can it be tested?" point of view, engineers are faced with a number of testing challenges. Add to that the economic challenges and the test community must find ways to test increasingly complex devices AND reduce cost of test. When approaching test, it is important to determine acceptable methodologies. For the purpose of this discussion, I propose three possible scenarios: 1) fault testing to verify that manufacturing processes produce a defect-free product; 2) functional testing to verify the SOC functions as intended; and 3) performance-based testing to verify the SOC meets published specs.
  • Keywords
    analogue integrated circuits; fault location; formal verification; integrated circuit economics; integrated circuit testing; integrated memory circuits; logic circuits; performance evaluation; radiofrequency integrated circuits; system-on-chip; IC test economics; RF test capability; SOC function verification; SOC specification verification; SiP; complex device testing; cost cutting methodologies; defect-free products; fault testing; functional testing; logic/analog/RF/memory blocks; manufacturing process verification; performance-based testing; system-in-package; system-on-chip; test cost reduction; wireless SOC RF testing; Bluetooth; Circuit faults; Circuit testing; Costs; Hardware; Logic testing; Performance evaluation; Radio frequency; Semiconductor device testing; System testing;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Test Conference, 2002. Proceedings. International
  • ISSN
    1089-3539
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-7542-4
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/TEST.2002.1041928
  • Filename
    1041928