• DocumentCode
    2397473
  • Title

    Exit vs. entrance block testing for cardiac lesion assessment

  • Author

    Ahlberg, Sarah E. ; Hong, Jinback ; Stewart, Mark T. ; Francischelli, David E. ; Kress, David C.

  • Author_Institution
    CardioVascular Div., Medtronic, Inc., Fridley, MN, USA
  • fYear
    2009
  • fDate
    3-6 Sept. 2009
  • Firstpage
    3282
  • Lastpage
    3285
  • Abstract
    Cardiac lesions are created to act as barriers which prohibit the transmission of cardiac myocyte contractile activity from one side of the lesion to the other. Testing for conduction block is the main way to acutely confirm the effectiveness of this therapy. There are two general methods used to test for conduction block. These methods are called: (1) "exit block testing" and (2) "entrance block testing." In this study, two different devices were used on n = 3D5 swine to determine if the method of lesion assessment (exit vs. entrance block testing) affected the ability to correctly identify if acute conduction block was achieved. No significant difference was found between conclusions drawn from either method of lesion assessment. However, the most robust lesion assessment will occur when both methods are employed so that the physician has the most information available for analysis.
  • Keywords
    cardiology; cellular biophysics; surgery; cardiac lesion assessment; cardiac myocyte contractile activity; conduction block testing; entrance block testing; exit block testing; Animals; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Catheter Ablation; Electrophysiology; Equipment Design; Heart; Heart Conduction System; Hemodynamics; Models, Statistical; Myocardial Contraction; Radio Waves; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; Swine;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2009. EMBC 2009. Annual International Conference of the IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    Minneapolis, MN
  • ISSN
    1557-170X
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-3296-7
  • Electronic_ISBN
    1557-170X
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5333777
  • Filename
    5333777