DocumentCode
2478531
Title
Quantization error in spatial sampling: comparison between square and hexagonal pixels
Author
Kamgar-Parsi, B. ; Kamgar-Parsi, B. ; Sander, W.A.
Author_Institution
Comput. Vision Lab., Maryland Univ., College Park, MD, USA
fYear
1989
fDate
4-8 Jun 1989
Firstpage
604
Lastpage
611
Abstract
Square and hexagonal spatial samplings, because of their processing ease, are used most widely in image and signal processing. The authors develop mathematical tools for estimating quantization error in hexagonal sensory configurations. These include analytic expressions for the average error and the error distribution of a function of an arbitrarily large number of hexagonally quantized variables. The two quantities (the average error and the error distribution) are essential in assessing the reliability of a given algorithm. The corresponding expressions for square spatial sampling are presented for comparison; they can be used to determine which sampling technique would result in less quantization error for a particular algorithm. Such a comparison is important due to the paramount role that quantization error plays in computational approaches to computer vision. Some general observations in regard to the relative accuracy of hexagonal vs. square quantization are also presented
Keywords
picture processing; roundoff errors; algorithm reliability; average error; computer vision; error distribution; hexagonal pixels; hexagonal sensory configurations; image processing; quantization error; signal processing; spatial sampling; Computer vision; Image sampling; Laboratories; Layout; Pixel; Quantization; Sampling methods; Sensor arrays; Signal sampling; Spatial resolution;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1989. Proceedings CVPR '89., IEEE Computer Society Conference on
Conference_Location
San Diego, CA
ISSN
1063-6919
Print_ISBN
0-8186-1952-x
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/CVPR.1989.37908
Filename
37908
Link To Document