DocumentCode
2494217
Title
Comparison of Hadamard imaging and compressed sensing for low resolution hyperspectral imaging
Author
Streeter, L. ; Burling-Claridge, G.R. ; Cree, M.J. ; Künnemeyer, R.
Author_Institution
Dept. of Eng., Univ. of Waikato, Hamilton
fYear
2008
fDate
26-28 Nov. 2008
Firstpage
1
Lastpage
6
Abstract
Image multiplexing is the technique of using combination patterns to measure multiple pixels with one sensor. Hyperspectral imaging is acquiring images with full spectra at each pixel. Using a single point spectrometer and light modulation we perform multiplexed hyperspectral imaging. We compare two forms of multiplexing, namely Hadamard imaging and compressed sensing, at low resolution. We show that Hadamard imaging is the more accurate and precise method. The primary benefit of compressed sensing is that generally a reduced number of acquisitions are necessary for accurate reconstruction. Reasonable reconstruction was achieved with compressed sensing. For example at approximately three fifths the number of measurements for Hadamard imaging, the SNR of compressed sensing approached that of Hadamard imaging with about 15% reconstruction error.
Keywords
Hadamard codes; Hadamard transforms; image coding; image reconstruction; Hadamard imaging; compressed sensing; image multiplexing; image reconstruction; light modulation; low resolution hyperspectral imaging; single point spectrometer; Additive noise; Compressed sensing; Hyperspectral imaging; Hyperspectral sensors; Image reconstruction; Image resolution; Image sensors; Optical imaging; Optical noise; Pixel; Hadamard imaging; Hyperspectral imaging; compressed sensing;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Image and Vision Computing New Zealand, 2008. IVCNZ 2008. 23rd International Conference
Conference_Location
Christchurch
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-3780-1
Electronic_ISBN
978-1-4244-2583-9
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/IVCNZ.2008.4762074
Filename
4762074
Link To Document