DocumentCode
2498314
Title
Pseudospectral methods versus FDTD
Author
Georgakopoulos, S.V. ; Balanis, C.A. ; Renaut, R.
Author_Institution
Dept. of Electr. Eng., Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ, USA
Volume
3
fYear
2000
fDate
16-21 July 2000
Firstpage
1506
Abstract
In this paper pseudospectral methods are applied to the solution of electromagnetic problems. Specifically, the Chebyshev collocation method is used along with a mapping of the grid to relax the restrictions on the time-step. Entire-domain as well as multi-domain approaches are considered. The system of ordinary differential equations that comes from the spectral method formulation is solved using either the standard Runge-Kutta method of order four (RK4), or a newly developed algorithm from the class of diagonally implicit multistage integration methods. The accuracy of the spectral methods for all the different approaches is compared with that of the classical second-order FDTD scheme. Additionally, the CPU time as well as the memory required to achieve certain accuracy are reported for both the spectral and the FDTD methods.
Keywords
Chebyshev approximation; Maxwell equations; Runge-Kutta methods; differential equations; electromagnetic field theory; finite difference time-domain analysis; spectral-domain analysis; Chebyshev collocation method; FDTD; Runge-Kutta method; electromagnetic problems; entire-domain approach; multi-domain approach; multistage integration methods; ordinary differential equations; pseudospectral methods; spectral method formulation; Delta modulation; Finite difference methods; Frequency; Interpolation; Lagrangian functions; Mathematics; Maxwell equations; Polynomials; Standards development; Time domain analysis;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, 2000. IEEE
Conference_Location
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Print_ISBN
0-7803-6369-8
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/APS.2000.874494
Filename
874494
Link To Document