• DocumentCode
    2690871
  • Title

    Passive vs. aggressive strategies: A game theoretic analysis of military defense

  • Author

    Bewick, Sharon ; Zhang, Mingjun ; Hamel, William ; Yang, Ruoting

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Mech., Aerosp. & Biomed. Eng., Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA
  • fYear
    2009
  • fDate
    10-15 Oct. 2009
  • Firstpage
    1873
  • Lastpage
    1878
  • Abstract
    This paper describes a basic passive vs. aggressive defense model, and analyzes it in terms of defense strategies against an intelligent enemy. In response to varying combinations of passive and aggressive defense, we assume that the enemy can up- or down-regulate recruitment activity. This leads to a differential game formulation of battle scenarios that we analyze for a warfare situation. Specifically, we consider military counterterrorist activities in a civilian population. Simulation results, including uncertainty and sensitivity analyses, are provided to demonstrate the benefits and limitations of the proposed model in terms of understanding army defense plans.
  • Keywords
    game theory; military systems; army defense plans; civilian population; differential game formulation; game theoretic analysis; intelligent enemy; military defense; passive vs. aggressive defense model; warfare situation; Game theory; Hypercubes; Intelligent robots; Optimal control; Predictive models; Recruitment; Sampling methods; Sensitivity analysis; USA Councils; Uncertainty;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2009. IROS 2009. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    St. Louis, MO
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-3803-7
  • Electronic_ISBN
    978-1-4244-3804-4
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IROS.2009.5354777
  • Filename
    5354777