• DocumentCode
    2794703
  • Title

    Design process error-proofing: benchmarking the NASA development life-cycle

  • Author

    Chao, Lawrence P. ; Tumer, Irem ; Ishii, Kosuke

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Mech. Eng., Stanford Univ., CA
  • fYear
    2005
  • fDate
    5-12 March 2005
  • Firstpage
    4327
  • Lastpage
    4338
  • Abstract
    This report describes the practices of the development life-cycle observed at NASA. Through a number of interviews and surveys of the NASA experience, including current projects such as Aura, CALIPSO, Kepler, SAGE and SOFIA, this research attempts to capture the design methods and culture present. The NASA development methods are shared and compared with industry practices, including gated realization processes, portfolio management, and platform design. The goal of this work is to identify best practices and lessons learned from NASA´s design and review experience, benchmark against industry techniques, and develop strategies to improve the process. With better understanding of not only the execution but motivation for the current development life-cycle, any organization can better improve and error-proof its design process
  • Keywords
    life cycle costing; space research; Aura; CALIPSO; Kepler; NASA development life-cycle; SAGE; SOFIA; error-proofing; gated realization processes; platform design; portfolio management; Aerospace industry; Laboratories; NASA; Process design; Propulsion; Space exploration; Space missions; Space shuttles; Space stations; Space technology; NASA; design review; error-proofing; life-cycle;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Aerospace Conference, 2005 IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    Big Sky, MT
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-8870-4
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/AERO.2005.1559738
  • Filename
    1559738