• DocumentCode
    2898514
  • Title

    Effect of deposition method on laser-induced damage threshold for repetitive pulses

  • Author

    Melninkaitis, A. ; Rakickas, T. ; Miksys, D. ; Grigonis, R. ; Sirutkaitis, K. ; Buzelis, R. ; Drazdys, R. ; Abromavicius, G.

  • Author_Institution
    Laser Res. Centre, Vilnius Univ., Lithuania
  • fYear
    2005
  • fDate
    12-17 June 2005
  • Firstpage
    324
  • Abstract
    In this paper, we performed comparison of laser-induced damage threshold (LIDT) for ion-assisted deposition (IAD) and non-IAD coatings in nanosecond and femtosecond pulse ranges. S-on-I tests were performed for 104 pulses at 1-kHz repetition rate. Equivalent BK7 substrates with the same surface roughness were coated for comparison of the two coating. The results were analysed using AFM and XRD. The difference in LIDT values for 130 fs pulses between the IAD optical coating and non-IAD coating deposited on the substrate with the same polishing quality was equal within range of measurement accuracy. In contrast to femtosecond pulses the LIDT values for the nanosecond pulses showed stronger and opposite correlation with the deposition methods.
  • Keywords
    antireflection coatings; high-speed optical techniques; ion beam assisted deposition; laser beam effects; optical films; optical glass; surface roughness; 130 fs; AFM; BK7 substrate; LIDT; XRD; femtosecond pulse; ion-assisted deposition; laser-induced damage threshold; nanosecond pulse; nonIAD coating; optical coating; surface roughness; Coatings; Optical pulses; Performance evaluation; Pulse measurements; Pulsed laser deposition; Rough surfaces; Surface roughness; Testing; Ultrafast optics; X-ray scattering;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe, 2005. CLEO/Europe. 2005 Conference on
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-8974-3
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/CLEOE.2005.1568107
  • Filename
    1568107