DocumentCode
2914427
Title
Improving undergraduate academic advising in engineering: it´s not rocket science
Author
Woolston, Donald C.
Author_Institution
Wisconsin Univ., Madison, WI, USA
Volume
3
fYear
2002
fDate
6-9 Nov. 2002
Abstract
Advising undergraduates in engineering education is problematic at most institutions. The thesis of this paper is that one reason advising is hard to do successfully in engineering is because engineering educators try to improve it with typical engineering approaches and philosophies, to which advising is not amenable. The approach taken by most engineering educators to advising is that it is an information flow problem. In fact, it is an interpersonal dynamics problem, to be solved by improving the quality of face-to-face interaction between individual students and individual faculty.
Keywords
engineering education; Gestalt thinking; deterministic thinking; engineering approaches; engineering education; engineering educators; engineering philosophies; engineering problem solving; engineering undergraduate academic advising; face-to-face interaction; information flow problem; interpersonal dynamics problem; student satisfaction; Accreditation; Chemistry; Data engineering; Educational institutions; Employee welfare; Engineering education; Flowcharts; History; Problem-solving; Rockets;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Frontiers in Education, 2002. FIE 2002. 32nd Annual
ISSN
0190-5848
Print_ISBN
0-7803-7444-4
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/FIE.2002.1158653
Filename
1158653
Link To Document