• DocumentCode
    2916130
  • Title

    An experimental comparison of PI, inversion, and damping control for high performance nanopositioning

  • Author

    Fleming, Andrew J. ; Leang, Kam K.

  • Author_Institution
    Sch. of Electr. Eng. & Comput. Sci., Univ. of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
  • fYear
    2013
  • fDate
    17-19 June 2013
  • Firstpage
    6027
  • Lastpage
    6032
  • Abstract
    This article compares the performance of three feedback control methodologies for high performance nanopositioning applications. Integral resonance damping control is a new approach for controlling mechanical systems. In this approach, the system resonances are actively damped rather than inverted which maximizes the closed-loop bandwidth and provides robustness to changes in the resonance frequencies. This technique is comprehensively compared to the standard methods of PI and inversion control in a practical environment. A five times improvement in the settling-time and bandwidth is demonstrated.
  • Keywords
    PI control; closed loop systems; control system synthesis; damping; feedback; microrobots; nanopositioning; PI control; closed-loop bandwidth; feedback control; high performance nanopositioning; integral resonance damping control; inversion control; resonance frequency; Bandwidth; Damping; Frequency control; Gain; Load modeling; Nanopositioning; Resonant frequency;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    American Control Conference (ACC), 2013
  • Conference_Location
    Washington, DC
  • ISSN
    0743-1619
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4799-0177-7
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ACC.2013.6580782
  • Filename
    6580782