DocumentCode
2969167
Title
Comparative compliance of representative lead designs for surface mounted components
Author
Kotlowitz, Robert W.
Author_Institution
AT&T Bell Lab., Whippany, NJ, USA
fYear
1989
fDate
22-24 May 1989
Firstpage
791
Lastpage
831
Abstract
Equations for the directional spring constants for common compliant lead designs for surface-mounted (SM) components are given. The lead configurations include the straight J-lead, dimpled J-lead, gull-wing lead, butt-lead (I-lead), and S-bend lead. The updated lead geometries and analysis method represent an expanded treatment of previous lead compliance studies by the author. The present objectives are to demonstrate applications of the analytic tool developed and identify the directional stiffness parameters that should be considered when assessing the compliance of a specific lead design. Comparative lead compliance evaluation has been performed for different SM components tested using accelerated function cycling or circuit-board dynamic bending. The solder-joint cycles-to-failure data indicate that significant differences in attachment fatigue performance can be correlated with disparate lead compliance among the SM packages tested
Keywords
elastic constants; fatigue testing; lead bonding; soldering; surface mount technology; I-lead; S-bend lead; accelerated function cycling; attachment fatigue performance; butt-lead; circuit-board dynamic bending; compliant lead designs; dimpled J-lead; directional spring constants; directional stiffness parameters; gull-wing lead; lead compliance evaluation; lead geometries; packages; solder-joint cycles-to-failure data; straight J-lead; surface mounted components; Circuit testing; Equations; Fatigue; Geometry; Lead; Life estimation; Performance evaluation; Samarium; Springs; Surface treatment;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Electronic Components Conference, 1989. Proceedings., 39th
Conference_Location
Houston, TX
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ECC.1989.77841
Filename
77841
Link To Document