• DocumentCode
    3072936
  • Title

    Radiation effects in interventional radiology using biological and physical dosimetry methods: A case-control study

  • Author

    Ramos, Miguel ; Montoro, Alegría ; Almonacid, Miguel ; Ferrer, Silvia ; Barquinero, Joan Francesc ; Tortosa, Ricardo ; Verdú, Gumersindo ; Rodríguez, Pilar ; Barrios, LLeonard ; Villaescusa, Juan Ignacio

  • Author_Institution
    Departamento de Ingenier?a Qu?mica y Nuclear, Universidad Polit?cnica de Valencia, Spain
  • fYear
    2008
  • fDate
    20-25 Aug. 2008
  • Firstpage
    2809
  • Lastpage
    2812
  • Abstract
    Interventional radiologists and staff members are frequently exposed to protracted and fractionated low doses of ionizing radiation, which extend during all their professional activities. These exposures can derive, due to the irradiation of skin tissues and peripheral blood, in deterministic effects (radiodermitis, aged skin, hands depilation) or stochastic ones (skin and non-solid cancers incidence). Epidemiological studies of population exposed to ionizing radiation provide information of radio-induced effects. The radiation risk or radiological detriment has been estimated from a group of six exposed interventionist radiologists of the Hospital La Fe (Valencia, Spain). Dosimetry has been periodically registered from TLD´s and wrist dosimeters (physical methods) and estimated through translocations in lymphocytes of peripheral blood (biological methods), by extrapolating the yield of translocations to their respective dose-effect curves. The probability of non-melanoma skin cancer and leukaemia (acute myelogenous, acute lymphocytic and chronic myelogenous leukaemia) incidence has been estimated through the software RADRISK. This software is based on a transport model from epidemiological studies of population exposed to external low-LET ionizing radiation [1]. Other non-solid carcinomas have not been considered due to their low statistical power, such as myeloid and non-Hodgkin lymphomas. The discrepancies observed between the physically recorded doses and biological estimated doses could indicate that exposed workers did not always wear their dosimeters or these dosimeters were not always exposed to the radiation field.
  • Keywords
    Aging; Blood; Dosimetry; Fractionation; Ionizing radiation; Professional activities; Radiation effects; Radiology; Skin; Stochastic processes; Adult; Case-Control Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced; Occupational Exposure; Radiology, Interventional; Radiometry; Risk; Skin Neoplasms; Software;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2008. EMBS 2008. 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    Vancouver, BC
  • ISSN
    1557-170X
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-1814-5
  • Electronic_ISBN
    1557-170X
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4649786
  • Filename
    4649786