• DocumentCode
    452027
  • Title

    Panel: Microprocessor Testing: Which Technique Is Best?

  • Author

    Abraham, J.A.

  • Author_Institution
    Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX
  • fYear
    1994
  • fDate
    6-10 June 1994
  • Firstpage
    294
  • Lastpage
    294
  • Abstract
    Microprocessors, in some sense, symbolize the universe in design techniques. Virtually all general and special test techniques are applicable to some section of a microprocessor. What are some of the key companies doing for microprocessor testing today? Is there really a difference between verification and testing of a microprocessor? How much of testing can we afford to do? How do the various fault models really stack up against actual failures? What is an adequate coverage number? How effective are built-in self-test (BIST) techniques? Can we really tolerate the performance hit from BIST techniques? Is there a convergence of ideas on how to do BIST? What are the major companies doing for fault simulation, test pattern generation? Is tester performance keeping up with the advances in design? How severe is the pin count problem of the testers? What are the future challenges?
  • Keywords
    Built-in self-test; Convergence; Graphics; Jacobian matrices; Microprocessors; Silicon; Sun; Test pattern generators; Testing;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Design Automation, 1994. 31st Conference on
  • ISSN
    0738-100X
  • Print_ISBN
    0-89791-653-0
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/DAC.1994.204114
  • Filename
    1600387