DocumentCode
514840
Title
Notice of Retraction
Justifying the Bell´s Mathematical Formulation
Author
Zhengjun Cao ; Lihua Liu
Author_Institution
Dept. of Math., Univ. Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
Volume
1
fYear
2010
fDate
6-7 March 2010
Firstpage
145
Lastpage
148
Abstract
Notice of Retraction
After careful and considered review of the content of this paper by a duly constituted expert committee, this paper has been found to be in violation of IEEE´s Publication Principles.
We hereby retract the content of this paper. Reasonable effort should be made to remove all past references to this paper.
The presenting author of this paper has the option to appeal this decision by contacting TPII@ieee.org.
Justifying a mathematical formulation is of great importance, since the reduction to absurdity in mathematics is convincing on the condition that the underlying formulation is convincing. Nowadays, however, there has no a formal theory about this topic. The Bell´s inequality is overwhelming in the sciences of quantum information and quantum computer, though Bell´s formulation for EPR argument is and show that the Bell´s formulation can not be discriminated logically from the new formulation. Since the new formulation does not depend on any physical interpretation, we remark Bell´s formulation is not undoubtful.
After careful and considered review of the content of this paper by a duly constituted expert committee, this paper has been found to be in violation of IEEE´s Publication Principles.
We hereby retract the content of this paper. Reasonable effort should be made to remove all past references to this paper.
The presenting author of this paper has the option to appeal this decision by contacting TPII@ieee.org.
Justifying a mathematical formulation is of great importance, since the reduction to absurdity in mathematics is convincing on the condition that the underlying formulation is convincing. Nowadays, however, there has no a formal theory about this topic. The Bell´s inequality is overwhelming in the sciences of quantum information and quantum computer, though Bell´s formulation for EPR argument is and show that the Bell´s formulation can not be discriminated logically from the new formulation. Since the new formulation does not depend on any physical interpretation, we remark Bell´s formulation is not undoubtful.
Keywords
mathematical analysis; Bell´s inequality; Bell´s mathematical formulation; EPR argument; formal theory; quantum computer science; quantum information science; Computer science; Computer science education; Educational technology; Mathematics; Paramagnetic resonance; Physics; Quantum computing; Quantum mechanics; Testing; Wave functions; Bell´s formulation; Bell´s inequality; EPR argument; quantum information;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Education Technology and Computer Science (ETCS), 2010 Second International Workshop on
Conference_Location
Wuhan
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-6388-6
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ETCS.2010.356
Filename
5459538
Link To Document