• DocumentCode
    580008
  • Title

    Geometric Complexity Theory V: Equivalence between Blackbox Derandomization of Polynomial Identity Testing and Derandomization of Noether´s Normalization Lemma

  • Author

    Mulmuley, Ketan D.

  • Author_Institution
    Comput. Sci. Dept., Univ. of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
  • fYear
    2012
  • fDate
    20-23 Oct. 2012
  • Firstpage
    629
  • Lastpage
    638
  • Abstract
    It is shown that black-box derandomization of polynomial identity testing (PIT) is essentially equivalent to derandomization of Noether´s Normalization Lemma for explicit algebraic varieties, the problem that lies at the heart of the foundational classification problem of algebraic geometry. Specifically: (1) It is shown that in characteristic zero black-box derandomization of PIT for diagonal depth three circuits brings the problem of derandomizing Noether´s Normalization Lemma, for the ring of invariants of any explicit linear action of a classical algebraic group of constant dimension, from EXPSPACE (where it is currently) to P. Next it is shown that assuming the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis (GRH), instead of the black-box derandomization hypothesis, brings the problem from EXPSPACE to quasi-PH, instead of P. Thus black-box derandomization of diagonal depth three circuits takes us farther than GRH here on the basis of the current knowledge. Variants of the main implication are also shown assuming, instead of the black-box derandomization hypothesis in characteristic zero, Boolean lower bounds for constant-depth threshold circuits or uniform Boolean conjectures, in conjunction with GRH. These results may explain in a unified way why proving lower bounds or derandomization results for constant-depth arithmetic circuits in characteristic zero or constant-depth Boolean threshold circuits, or proving uniform Boolean conjectures without relativizable proofs has turned out to be so hard, and also why GRH has turned out to be so hard from the complexity-theoretic perspective. Thus this investigation reveals that the foundational problems of Geometry (classification and GRH) and Complexity Theory (lower bounds and derandomization) share a common root difficulty that lies at the junction of these two fields. We refer to it as the GCT chasm. (2) It is shown that black-box derandomization of PIT in a strengthened form implies derandomization of Noether´s Normalization - emma in a strict form for any explicit algebraic variety. (3) Conversely, it is shown that derandomization of Noether´s Normalization Lemma in a strict form for specific explicit varieties implies this strengthened form of black box derandomization of PIT and its various variants. (4) A unified geometric complexity theory (GCT) approach to derandomization and classification is formulated on the basis of this equivalence.
  • Keywords
    Boolean functions; computational complexity; computational geometry; EXPSPACE; GCT; GRH; Noether normalization lemma derandomization; PIT; STIT; algebraic geometry classification problem; characteristic zero black-box derandomization; common root difficulty; complexity-theoretic perspective; constant-depth Boolean threshold circuits; constant-depth arithmetic circuits; constant-depth threshold circuits; diagonal depth three circuits; explicit algebraic varieties; generalized Riemann hypothesis; geometric complexity theory; polynomial identity testing; symbolic trace identity testing; uniform Boolean conjectures; Complexity theory; Computer science; Context; Geometry; Integral equations; Polynomials; Testing; Derandomization; Geometric Complexity Theory; Polynomial Idenity Testing;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2012 IEEE 53rd Annual Symposium on
  • Conference_Location
    New Brunswick, NJ
  • ISSN
    0272-5428
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4673-4383-1
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/FOCS.2012.15
  • Filename
    6375342