• DocumentCode
    611985
  • Title

    Comparison of 4 methods for transionospheric scintillation evaluation

  • Author

    Strangeways, Hal J. ; Zernov, Nikolay N. ; Gherm, Vadim E.

  • Author_Institution
    Electr. & Electron. Eng. Dept., Newcastle Univ., Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  • fYear
    2013
  • fDate
    8-12 April 2013
  • Firstpage
    3917
  • Lastpage
    3918
  • Abstract
    A comparison is made between 4 different methods of scintillation determination (the phase screen method, the Hybrid method, geometrical optics and the Rytov method) for transionospheric paths at GNSS frequencies. Calculations are made for both phase and amplitude scintillation indices. The methods shows good agreement in the calculations of the scintillation variation with the variance of the irregularity electron density, spectral index, outer scale, path elevation and other parameters but there are some quantitative differences. The effect of varying the phase screen height, irregularity velocity and a lower cut-off frequency are also investigated.
  • Keywords
    geometrical optics; ionospheric electromagnetic wave propagation; satellite navigation; GNSS frequencies; Rytov method; amplitude scintillation indices; geometrical optics; hybrid method; irregularity electron density; irregularity velocity; path elevation; phase screen height; phase screen method; scintillation determination; scintillation variation; spectral index; transionospheric paths; transionospheric scintillation evaluation; Irrigation; Nonhomogeneous media; Optical diffraction; Optical propagation; GNSS; ionospheric; navigaion; scintillation;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), 2013 7th European Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Gothenburg
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4673-2187-7
  • Electronic_ISBN
    978-88-907018-1-8
  • Type

    conf

  • Filename
    6547043