• DocumentCode
    65786
  • Title

    Comparison of Kasai Autocorrelation and Maximum Likelihood Estimators for Doppler Optical Coherence Tomography

  • Author

    Chan, Aldar C.-F. ; Lam, Edmund Y. ; Srinivasan, Vivek J.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Electr. & Electron. Eng., Univ. of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  • Volume
    32
  • Issue
    6
  • fYear
    2013
  • fDate
    Jun-13
  • Firstpage
    1033
  • Lastpage
    1042
  • Abstract
    In optical coherence tomography (OCT) and ultrasound, unbiased Doppler frequency estimators with low variance are desirable for blood velocity estimation. Hardware improvements in OCT mean that ever higher acquisition rates are possible, which should also, in principle, improve estimation performance. Paradoxically, however, the widely used Kasai autocorrelation estimator´s performance worsens with increasing acquisition rate. We propose that parametric estimators based on accurate models of noise statistics can offer better performance. We derive a maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) based on a simple additive white Gaussian noise model, and show that it can outperform the Kasai autocorrelation estimator. In addition, we also derive the Cramer Rao lower bound (CRLB), and show that the variance of the MLE approaches the CRLB for moderate data lengths and noise levels. We note that the MLE performance improves with longer acquisition time, and remains constant or improves with higher acquisition rates. These qualities may make it a preferred technique as OCT imaging speed continues to improve. Finally, our work motivates the development of more general parametric estimators based on statistical models of decorrelation noise.
  • Keywords
    AWGN; biomedical optical imaging; biomedical ultrasonics; blood; maximum likelihood estimation; optical tomography; CRLB; Cramer Rao lower bound; Doppler optical coherence tomography; Kasai autocorrelation estimators; MLE approaches; OCT; OCT imaging; acquisition rates; additive white Gaussian noise model; blood velocity estimation; decorrelation noise; maximum likelihood estimators; noise levels; noise statistics; statistical models; ultrasound estimators; unbiased Doppler frequency estimators; Computational modeling; Correlation; Doppler effect; Frequency estimation; Maximum likelihood estimation; Noise; Cramer–Rao bound (CRB); Doppler optical coherence tomography; Doppler ultrasound; frequency estimation; maximum likelihood estimation (MLE); Algorithms; Models, Theoretical; Phantoms, Imaging; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; Signal-To-Noise Ratio; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Ultrasonography, Doppler;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0278-0062
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TMI.2013.2248163
  • Filename
    6468104