DocumentCode
65786
Title
Comparison of Kasai Autocorrelation and Maximum Likelihood Estimators for Doppler Optical Coherence Tomography
Author
Chan, Aldar C.-F. ; Lam, Edmund Y. ; Srinivasan, Vivek J.
Author_Institution
Dept. of Electr. & Electron. Eng., Univ. of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Volume
32
Issue
6
fYear
2013
fDate
Jun-13
Firstpage
1033
Lastpage
1042
Abstract
In optical coherence tomography (OCT) and ultrasound, unbiased Doppler frequency estimators with low variance are desirable for blood velocity estimation. Hardware improvements in OCT mean that ever higher acquisition rates are possible, which should also, in principle, improve estimation performance. Paradoxically, however, the widely used Kasai autocorrelation estimator´s performance worsens with increasing acquisition rate. We propose that parametric estimators based on accurate models of noise statistics can offer better performance. We derive a maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) based on a simple additive white Gaussian noise model, and show that it can outperform the Kasai autocorrelation estimator. In addition, we also derive the Cramer Rao lower bound (CRLB), and show that the variance of the MLE approaches the CRLB for moderate data lengths and noise levels. We note that the MLE performance improves with longer acquisition time, and remains constant or improves with higher acquisition rates. These qualities may make it a preferred technique as OCT imaging speed continues to improve. Finally, our work motivates the development of more general parametric estimators based on statistical models of decorrelation noise.
Keywords
AWGN; biomedical optical imaging; biomedical ultrasonics; blood; maximum likelihood estimation; optical tomography; CRLB; Cramer Rao lower bound; Doppler optical coherence tomography; Kasai autocorrelation estimators; MLE approaches; OCT; OCT imaging; acquisition rates; additive white Gaussian noise model; blood velocity estimation; decorrelation noise; maximum likelihood estimators; noise levels; noise statistics; statistical models; ultrasound estimators; unbiased Doppler frequency estimators; Computational modeling; Correlation; Doppler effect; Frequency estimation; Maximum likelihood estimation; Noise; Cramer–Rao bound (CRB); Doppler optical coherence tomography; Doppler ultrasound; frequency estimation; maximum likelihood estimation (MLE); Algorithms; Models, Theoretical; Phantoms, Imaging; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; Signal-To-Noise Ratio; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Ultrasonography, Doppler;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0278-0062
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TMI.2013.2248163
Filename
6468104
Link To Document