DocumentCode
748117
Title
Comparison of compact gamma cameras with 1.3- and 2.0-mm quantized elements for dedicated emission mammotomography
Author
Tornai, Martin P. ; Brzymialkiewicz, Caryl N. ; Bradshaw, Marques L. ; Bowsher, James E. ; Patt, Bradley E. ; Iwanczyk, Jan S. ; Li, Joshua ; MacDonald, Lawrence R.
Author_Institution
Dept. of Radiol., Duke Univ. Med. Center, Durham, NC, USA
Volume
52
Issue
5
fYear
2005
Firstpage
1251
Lastpage
1256
Abstract
In an effort to image smaller breast lesions, two compact gamma cameras with different intrinsic NaI(Tl) pixel sizes are evaluated for use in the application specific emission tomography (ASET) system for dedicated mammotomographic emission imaging. Comparison measurements were made with two scintillator arrays having 1.3×1.3×6 mm3 or 2.0×2.0×6 mm3 elements on exactly the same set of PMTs, electronics and control/processing hardware. Uniformity, sensitivity and energy resolution were assessed with flood field phantoms. Spatial resolution measurements included: a 99mTc (140 keV) activity filled capillary tube imaged in planar mode from 1-10 cm distance; two such tubes separated by 2 cm were also imaged with simple circular tomography from 3-7 cm radii-of-rotation (RORs); and a 99mTc filled mini cold-rod phantom was imaged at 5 cm ROR with a simple circular orbit. Finally, a freely suspended and uniformly filled 950 mL breast phantom containing four fillable lesions (4-10 mm dia) was imaged with a lesion-to-uniform-background activity concentration ratio of 15:1, using simple and complex three-dimensional (3-D) orbits and minimal RORs. The measured sensitivity varied by the crystal fill-factor; uniformity had <4% variability; and mean energy resolutions of each camera were ≤12% full-width at half-maximum (FWHM). The planar spatial resolutions correspond to calculated values, with smaller pixels yielding 2%-13% better resolution with decreasing separation distance; tomographic results ranged from 3.2-5.2 mm FWHM at 3-7 cm, with nominally better contrast-resolution for the smaller pixel camera. Consistent with signal detection characteristics for these measurement conditions, quantitative SNRs and contrasts from lesion imaging with the uniform breast background illustrate better overall performance under nearly all conditions and for all lesions for the larger pixel camera.
Keywords
biomedical imaging; gamma-ray detection; mammography; phantoms; single photon emission computed tomography; solid scintillation detectors; technetium; 1.3 mm; 2 mm; 6 mm; 99Tcm; ASET system; NaI(Tl) pixel size; PMT; SPECT; activity filled capillary tube; application specific emission tomography; breast lesions; breast phantom; circular tomography; compact gamma cameras; complex three-dimensional orbits; control hardware; crystal fill-factor; energy resolution; full-width at half-maximum; lesion imaging; lesion-to-uniform-background activity concentration ratio; mammotomographic emission imaging; phantoms; planar mode; planar spatial resolutions; processing hardware; radii-of-rotation; scintillator arrays; signal detection characteristics; spatial resolution measurements; Breast; Cameras; Energy resolution; Extraterrestrial measurements; Imaging phantoms; Lesions; Optical imaging; Pixel; Spatial resolution; Tomography; Breast imaging; SPECT; gamma camera; mammotomography; quantized detector;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Nuclear Science, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0018-9499
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TNS.2005.858192
Filename
1546402
Link To Document