• DocumentCode
    818764
  • Title

    Registration and tracking to integrate X-ray and MR images in an XMR Facility

  • Author

    Rhode, Kawal S. ; Hill, Derek L G ; Edwards, Philip J. ; Hipwell, John ; Rueckert, Daniel ; Sanchez-Ortiz, Gerardo ; Hegde, Sanjeet ; Rahunathan, Vithuran ; Razavi, Reza

  • Author_Institution
    Div. of Imaging Sci., Guy´´s, King´´s & St Thomas´´ Sch. of Medicine, London, UK
  • Volume
    22
  • Issue
    11
  • fYear
    2003
  • Firstpage
    1369
  • Lastpage
    1378
  • Abstract
    We describe a registration and tracking technique to integrate cardiac X-ray images and cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) images acquired from a combined X-ray and MR interventional suite (XMR). Optical tracking is used to determine the transformation matrices relating MR image coordinates and X-ray image coordinates. Calibration of X-ray projection geometry and tracking of the X-ray C-arm and table enable three-dimensional (3-D) reconstruction of vessel centerlines and catheters from bi-plane X-ray views. We can, therefore, combine single X-ray projection images with registered projection MR images from a volume acquisition, and we can also display 3-D reconstructions of catheters within a 3-D or multi-slice MR volume. Registration errors were assessed using phantom experiments. Errors in the combined projection images (two-dimensional target registration error - TRE) were found to be 2.4 to 4.2 mm, and the errors in the integrated volume representation (3-D TRE) were found to be 4.6 to 5.1 mm. These errors are clinically acceptable for alignment of images of the great vessels and the chambers of the heart. Results are shown for two patients. The first involves overlay of a catheter used for invasive pressure measurements on an MR volume that provides anatomical context. The second involves overlay of invasive electrode catheters (including a basket catheter) on a tagged MR volume in order to relate electrophysiology to myocardial motion in a patient with an arrhythmia. Visual assessment of these results suggests the errors were of a similar magnitude to those obtained in the phantom measurements.
  • Keywords
    biomedical MRI; blood vessels; catheters; diagnostic radiography; image motion analysis; image reconstruction; image registration; medical image processing; optical tracking; phantoms; X-ray C-arm; X-ray projection geometry; XMR facility; arrhythmia; basket catheter; bi-plane X-ray views; cardiac MR images; cardiac X-ray images; electrophysiology; heart chambers; image registration; image tracking; invasive electrode catheters; invasive pressure measurements; magnetic resonance images; myocardial motion; optical tracking; phantoms; registered projection MR images; single X-ray projection images; three-dimensional reconstruction; transformation matrices; two-dimensional target registration error; vessel centerlines; Calibration; Catheters; Geometrical optics; Heart; Image reconstruction; Imaging phantoms; Magnetic resonance; Pressure measurement; Three dimensional displays; X-ray imaging; Adolescent; Algorithms; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Calibration; Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures; Equipment Failure Analysis; Heart; Humans; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; Male; Phantoms, Imaging; Radiographic Image Enhancement; Radiography; Radiology Department, Hospital; Subtraction Technique; Surgery, Computer-Assisted; Systems Integration;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0278-0062
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TMI.2003.819275
  • Filename
    1242340