DocumentCode
841810
Title
What is the future for watermarking? (Part II)
Author
Barni, M.
Volume
20
Issue
6
fYear
2003
Firstpage
53
Lastpage
59
Abstract
We focus on the emerging, nonsecurity-oriented applications of digital watermarking and data hiding in general. Then we consider a more technical topic, i.e., we compare, at a very general level, the two most important approaches to the watermarking problem proposed so far, namely, spread spectrum (SS) and quantization index modulation (QIM) random-binning-like watermarking. A rebuttal to the article by C. Herley, "Why watermarking is nonsense" (IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 10-11, Sept. 2002), is also presented with the intention of starting a discussion open to all the readers, on the controversial points raised by that article.
Keywords
data encapsulation; modulation; quantisation (signal); spread spectrum communication; watermarking; data hiding; digital watermarking; nonsecurity-oriented application; quantization index modulation; spread spectrum based technique; Data encapsulation; Data security; Degradation; Protection; Quantization; Robustness; Signal processing; Spread spectrum communication; Tagging; Watermarking;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
1053-5888
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/MSP.2003.1253554
Filename
1253554
Link To Document