DocumentCode
941870
Title
Britain: Second best by choice?
Author
Beuret, G.
Author_Institution
Leicester Polytechnic, Research Director of the Goals of Engineering Education Project, Leicester, UK
Volume
131
Issue
9
fYear
1984
fDate
12/1/1984 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
668
Lastpage
672
Abstract
It is argued that early industrialists´ claims to status were successfully resisted by the established ¿¿lite and that industry has never in Britain been accorded the high status that it has enjoyed in other industrial societies. UK industrial infrastructure, notably banking and technical education, did not develop along European lines. Britain´s relative industrial performance has been declining since about 1870, and her current efforts in biotechnology, magnetic scanners, space, IT and high technology generally are poor by comparison with her competitors. British engineering education is narrow, brief and underfunded in relation to its importance for industrial recovery and relative to our major competitors. Current and planned changes are modest and conservative reforms. The A level system perpetuates the arts/science divide and results in narrowly educated engineers, technically ignorant accountants, civil servants and politicians. This results in the exclusion of engineers from the higher levels of the policy process in industrial organisations and government, to the detriment of both. Significant change does not seem likely. It is concluded that Britain is opting, largely by default, for secondclass industrial status.
Keywords
education; engineering; British engineering education;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Physical Science, Measurement and Instrumentation, Management and Education - Reviews, IEE Proceedings A
Publisher
iet
ISSN
0143-702X
Type
jour
DOI
10.1049/ip-a-1.1984.0093
Filename
4647647
Link To Document