DocumentCode
994838
Title
High-frequency backscatter from terrain with cement-block walls
Author
Barnum, James R.
Author_Institution
Stanford Reasearch Inst., Menlo Park, CA, USA
Volume
19
Issue
3
fYear
1971
fDate
5/1/1971 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
343
Lastpage
347
Abstract
The measurements of high-frequency (HF) radar cross sections (RCSs)
of trees on a large flat field were reported a few years ago by Steele. This work used a special adaptation of the standing-wave method to 26 MHz. Shortly afterward, the present author used the same apparatus to measure the (RCSs) of cement walls erected on the same terrain. Wall sizes ranged from 5 ft high by 10 ft wide to 20 by 20 ft. Angles of elevation
ranged from 2.5 to
. Using vertical polarization (
field in the plane of incidence), cross sections increased with wall size. When a wall was thoroughly dampened,
increased by 3 to 13 dB, depending on
, and wall size over
was obtained when the wall was dry or partly damp. Chicken wire covering increased the 10- by 10-ft wall\´s cross section by 10 dB. Using horizontal polarization, cross sections were immeasurable for the smaller walls. For the 20- by 20-ft wall,
was a smoothly increasing function with
. When this wall was wet, its cross section increased by 4 dB. The wall-ground combination was treated as a corner reflector, using a theory based on physical optics. The theory compares fairly well to experimental cross sections for the 20- by 20-ft wall. Extrapolation of the theory suggests that a 150-ft high by 100-ft wide building could have a cross section approaching
m2at 26 MHz.
of trees on a large flat field were reported a few years ago by Steele. This work used a special adaptation of the standing-wave method to 26 MHz. Shortly afterward, the present author used the same apparatus to measure the (RCSs) of cement walls erected on the same terrain. Wall sizes ranged from 5 ft high by 10 ft wide to 20 by 20 ft. Angles of elevation
ranged from 2.5 to
. Using vertical polarization (
field in the plane of incidence), cross sections increased with wall size. When a wall was thoroughly dampened,
increased by 3 to 13 dB, depending on
, and wall size over
was obtained when the wall was dry or partly damp. Chicken wire covering increased the 10- by 10-ft wall\´s cross section by 10 dB. Using horizontal polarization, cross sections were immeasurable for the smaller walls. For the 20- by 20-ft wall,
was a smoothly increasing function with
. When this wall was wet, its cross section increased by 4 dB. The wall-ground combination was treated as a corner reflector, using a theory based on physical optics. The theory compares fairly well to experimental cross sections for the 20- by 20-ft wall. Extrapolation of the theory suggests that a 150-ft high by 100-ft wide building could have a cross section approaching
m2at 26 MHz.Keywords
HF radio propagation; Radar scattering cross sections; Radio propagation terrain factors; Atmospheric measurements; Backscatter; Earth; Hafnium; Optical polarization; Physical optics; Probes; Radar cross section; Size measurement; Wire;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Antennas and Propagation, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0018-926X
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TAP.1971.1139934
Filename
1139934
Link To Document