Title of article :
Metrics to evaluate research performance in academic institutions: a critique of ERA 2010 as applied in forestry and the indirect H2 index as a possible alternative
Author/Authors :
Jerome K. Vanclay ، نويسنده , , Lutz Bornmann ، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2012
Pages :
21
From page :
751
To page :
771
Abstract :
Excellence for Research in Australia (ERA) is an attempt by the Australian Research Council to rate Australian universities on a 5-point scale within 180 Fields of Research using metrics and peer evaluation by an evaluation committee. Some of the bibliometric data contributing to this ranking suffer statistical issues associated with skewed distributions. Other data are standardised year-by-year, placing undue emphasis on the most recent publications which may not yet have reliable citation patterns. The bibliometric data offered to the evaluation committees is extensive, but lacks effective syntheses such as the h-index and its variants. The indirect H2 index is objective, can be computed automatically and efficiently, is resistant to manipulation, and a good indicator of impact to assist the ERA evaluation committees and to similar evaluations internationally.
Journal title :
Scientometrics
Serial Year :
2012
Journal title :
Scientometrics
Record number :
1016243
Link To Document :
بازگشت