• Title of article

    Determination of acetaldehyde in saliva by gas-diffusion flow injection analysis Original Research Article

  • Author/Authors

    Adlin N. Ramdzan، نويسنده , , Patrick J. Mornane، نويسنده , , Michael J. McCullough، نويسنده , , Waldemar Mazurek، نويسنده , , Spas D. Kolev، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
  • Pages
    8
  • From page
    70
  • To page
    77
  • Abstract
    The consumption of ethanol is known to increase the likelihood of oral cancer. In addition, there has been a growing concern about possible association between long term use of ethanol-containing mouthwashes and oral cancer. Acetaldehyde, known to be a carcinogen, is the first metabolite of ethanol and it can be produced in the oral cavity after consumption or exposure to ethanol. This paper reports on the development of a gas-diffusion flow injection method for the online determination of salivary acetaldehyde by its colour reaction with 3-methyl-2-benzothiazolinone hydrazone (MBTH) and ferric chloride. Acetaldehyde samples and standards (80 μL) were injected into the donor stream containing NaCl from which acetaldehyde diffused through the hydrophobic Teflon membrane of the gas-diffusion cell into the acceptor stream containing the two reagents mentioned above. The resultant intense green coloured dye was monitored spectrophotometrically at 600 nm. Under the optimum working conditions the method is characterized by a sampling rate of 9 h−1, a linear calibration range of 0.5–15 mg L−1 (absorbance = 5.40 × 10−2 [acetaldehyde, mg L−1], R2 = 0.998), a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 1.90% (n = 10, acetaldehyde concentration of 2.5 mg L−1), and a limit of detection (LOD) of 12.3 μg L−1. The LOD and sampling rate of the proposed method are superior to those of the conventional gas chromatographic (GC) method (LOD = 93.0 μg L−1 and sampling rate = 4 h−1). The reliability of the proposed method was illustrated by the fact that spiked with acetaldehyde saliva samples yielded excellent recoveries (96.6–101.9%), comparable to those obtained by GC (96.4–102.3%) and there was no statistically significant difference at the 95% confidence level between the two methods when non-spiked saliva samples were analysed.
  • Keywords
    Saliva , Acetaldehyde , Flow injection analysis , Gas-diffusion , 3-Methyl-2-benzothiazolinone hydrazone
  • Journal title
    Analytica Chimica Acta
  • Serial Year
    2013
  • Journal title
    Analytica Chimica Acta
  • Record number

    1029506