Spectrophotometric determination of metal ions in electroplating solutions in the presence of EDTA with the aid of multivariate calibration and artificial neural networks Original Research Article

Metal ions such as Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), Fe(III) and Cr(III), which are commonly present in electroplating baths at high concentrations, were analysed simultaneously by a spectrophotometric method modified by the inclusion of the ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA) solution as a chromogenic reagent. The prediction of the metal ion concentrations was facilitated by the use of an orthogonal array design to build a calibration data set consisting of absorption spectra collected in the 370–760 nm range from solution mixtures containing the five metal ions earlier. With the aid of this data set, calibration models were built based on 10 different chemometrics methods such as classical least squares (CLS), principal component regression (PCR), partial least squares (PLS), artificial neural networks (ANN) and others. These were tested with the use of a validation data set constructed from synthetic solutions of the five metal ions. The analytical performance of these chemometrics methods were characterized by relative prediction errors and recoveries (%). On the basis of these results, the computational methods were ranked according to their performances using the multi-criteria decision making procedures preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE) and geometrical analysis for interactive aid (GAIA). PLS and PCR models applied to the spectral data matrix that used the first derivative pre-treatment were the preferred methods. They together with ANN-radial basis function (RBF) and PLS were applied for analysis of results from some typical industrial samples analysed by the EDTA-spectrophotometric method described. DPLS, DPCR and the ANN-RBF chemometrics methods performed particularly well especially when compared with some target values provided by industry.