Strategic analysis of Iranʹʹs nuclear conflict with graph model for conflict resolution

In this paper, the nuclear conflict of Iran, which is one of the most strategic conflicts at world, is analyzed. Since the decision makers at this conflict persist on own interests, the conflict has been analyzed using non-cooperative game theory approaches. So, The United Nations Security Council (UNSC), International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), South Korea and Iran are considered as the key players in the conflict and according to the six main concepts of stability definitions which is constituted Nash Stability, General Meta Rationality (GMR), Sequential Stability (SEQ), Limited-Move Stability (LH) and Non-Myopic Stability, is created a stability state for each players and outcome as well as equilibrium are indicated for overall system. The results indicates that UNSC supports from military attack to Iran at non of states and has no intention to refer the nuclear dossier to IAEA and tightening new sanctions against Iran. In contrast, game theory approaches emphasizes that Iran continues nuclear activities and suspends enrichment not at all.