Title of article :
Iron-porphyrin encapsulated in poly(methacrylic acid) and mesoporous Al-MCM-41 as catalysts in the oxidation of benzene to phenol
Author/Authors :
Hadi Nur، نويسنده , , Helda Hamid، نويسنده , , Salasiah Endud، نويسنده , , Halimaton Hamdan، نويسنده , , Zainab Ramli، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
دوهفته نامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
Pages :
6
From page :
337
To page :
342
Abstract :
Poly(methacrylic acid) (PMAA) and mesoporous molecular sieve Al-MCM-41 with Si/Al = 20 were used as supports for the encapsulation of bulky iron(III)-5,10,15,20-tetra-(4-pyridyl)porphyrin (Fe-TPyP). Metalloporphyrin of Fe(III) was encapsulated inside the mesopores of Al-MCM-41 by a process of sequential synthesis of Fe-TPyP by treatment of FeCl3 with 5,10,15,20-tetra-(4-pyridyl) porphyrin (TPyP), followed by encapsulation of Fe-TPyP. Fe-TPyP complexes were also successfully encapsulated in PMAA by polymerizing a monomer (MAA) with a cross-linker around the Fe-TPyP complexes. The materials obtained were identified using XRD, UV–vis DR, FTIR and luminescence spectroscopies. The oxidation of benzene to phenol using aqueous hydrogen peroxide has been studied using both iron-porphyrin encapsulated in poly(methacrylic acid) and mesoporous Al-MCM-41 as catalysts. The encapsulated iron-porphyrin in PMAA (Fe-TPyP–PMAA) give a higher catalytic activity compared to Fe-TPyP encapsulated in Al-MCM-41 (Fe-TPyP–MCM-41). However, the product selectivity and the regenerability of Fe-TPyP–PMAA are not as good as than those of Fe-TPyP–MCM-41. One considers that the hydrophobic nature of Fe-TPyP–PMAA may account for the high catalytic activity, and the ordered structure of Fe-TPyP–MCM-41 may contribute to a high selectivity.
Keywords :
Al-MCM-41 , Encapsulation , Iron-porphyrin , Poly(methacrylic acid) , Phenol
Journal title :
Materials Chemistry and Physics
Serial Year :
2006
Journal title :
Materials Chemistry and Physics
Record number :
1064181
Link To Document :
بازگشت