• Title of article

    Iron-porphyrin encapsulated in poly(methacrylic acid) and mesoporous Al-MCM-41 as catalysts in the oxidation of benzene to phenol

  • Author/Authors

    Hadi Nur، نويسنده , , Helda Hamid، نويسنده , , Salasiah Endud، نويسنده , , Halimaton Hamdan، نويسنده , , Zainab Ramli، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    دوهفته نامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
  • Pages
    6
  • From page
    337
  • To page
    342
  • Abstract
    Poly(methacrylic acid) (PMAA) and mesoporous molecular sieve Al-MCM-41 with Si/Al = 20 were used as supports for the encapsulation of bulky iron(III)-5,10,15,20-tetra-(4-pyridyl)porphyrin (Fe-TPyP). Metalloporphyrin of Fe(III) was encapsulated inside the mesopores of Al-MCM-41 by a process of sequential synthesis of Fe-TPyP by treatment of FeCl3 with 5,10,15,20-tetra-(4-pyridyl) porphyrin (TPyP), followed by encapsulation of Fe-TPyP. Fe-TPyP complexes were also successfully encapsulated in PMAA by polymerizing a monomer (MAA) with a cross-linker around the Fe-TPyP complexes. The materials obtained were identified using XRD, UV–vis DR, FTIR and luminescence spectroscopies. The oxidation of benzene to phenol using aqueous hydrogen peroxide has been studied using both iron-porphyrin encapsulated in poly(methacrylic acid) and mesoporous Al-MCM-41 as catalysts. The encapsulated iron-porphyrin in PMAA (Fe-TPyP–PMAA) give a higher catalytic activity compared to Fe-TPyP encapsulated in Al-MCM-41 (Fe-TPyP–MCM-41). However, the product selectivity and the regenerability of Fe-TPyP–PMAA are not as good as than those of Fe-TPyP–MCM-41. One considers that the hydrophobic nature of Fe-TPyP–PMAA may account for the high catalytic activity, and the ordered structure of Fe-TPyP–MCM-41 may contribute to a high selectivity.
  • Keywords
    Al-MCM-41 , Encapsulation , Iron-porphyrin , Poly(methacrylic acid) , Phenol
  • Journal title
    Materials Chemistry and Physics
  • Serial Year
    2006
  • Journal title
    Materials Chemistry and Physics
  • Record number

    1064181