Title of article :
Reasoned modelling critics: Turning failed proofs into modelling guidance
Author/Authors :
Andrew Ireland and Jamie Stark ، نويسنده , , Gudmund Grov، نويسنده , , Maria Teresa Llano، نويسنده , , Michael Butler، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
Pages :
17
From page :
293
To page :
309
Abstract :
The activities of formal modelling and reasoning are closely related. But while the rigour of building formal models brings significant benefits, formal reasoning remains a major barrier to the wider acceptance of formalism within design. Here we propose reasoned modelling critics — an approach which aims to abstract away from the complexities of low-level proof obligations, and provide high-level modelling guidance to designers when proofs fail. Inspired by proof planning critics, the technique combines proof-failure analysis with modelling heuristics. Here, we present the details of our proposal, implement them in a prototype and outline future plans.
Keywords :
Reasoned modelling , formal methods , Formal modelling , formal verification , Automated reasoning , artificial intelligence
Journal title :
Science of Computer Programming
Serial Year :
2013
Journal title :
Science of Computer Programming
Record number :
1080323
Link To Document :
بازگشت