• Title of article

    Utilisation of waste heat from GT–MHR and PBMR reactors for nuclear desalination Original Research Article

  • Author/Authors

    Saied Dardour، نويسنده , , Simon Nisan، نويسنده , , Françoise Charbit، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
  • Pages
    15
  • From page
    254
  • To page
    268
  • Abstract
    The gas turbine–modular helium cooled reactor (GT–MHR) is currently being developed by an international consortium; the pebble bed modular reactor (PBMR) is to be constructed in South Africa. In both these reactors, circulating helium that has to be compressed in two successive stages cools the reactor core. For thermodynamic reasons, these compression stages require pre-cooling of the helium to about 26°C through the use of pre-cooler and intercooler helium-water heat exchangers. Considerable thermal power (≈300 MWth) is thus dissipated in the precooler and the intercooler. This thermal power is then evacuated to the heat sink. Depending upon the specific designs, the temperature ranges of the water in these exchangers could be between 80 and 130°C. This is an ideal range for desalination in a multiple-effect distillation (MED) plant, which can be coupled between a mixer (of the flows from the pre-cooler and the intercooler) and the switch- cooling unit, evacuating the heat to the heat sink (sea or river). It is thus interesting to evaluate the desalination costs of such a system, utilising virtually free heat. The usual code for desalination cost evaluation is the DEEP software, developed by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Actual versions of DEEP do not have models for GT–MHR and the PBMR providing heat for desalination. This paper describes the successive steps that led CEA to the development of these models from basic thermodynamic considerations and their integration in the new, CEA version of the DEEP code. The models are then applied to a realistic case study based on the TUNDESAL project [1]. It is shown that the desalination cost of a GT–MHR + MED system is 34% lower than that of a gas turbine, combined cycle plant + MED system, for a fossil fuel price of about 21 $/bbl and a discount rate of 8%. Under the same conditions, this cost is 2% lower for the PBMR + MED systems.
  • Keywords
    HTR waste heat utilisation , Low-cost desalination
  • Journal title
    Desalination
  • Serial Year
    2007
  • Journal title
    Desalination
  • Record number

    1110725