The mechanism of the type III antifreeze protein action: a computational study Original Research Article

The random network model of water quantitatively describes the different hydration heat capacities of polar and apolar solutes in terms of differential distortions of the water–water hydrogen bonding angle in the first hydration shell. This method of hydration analysis is applied here to study the hydration of the wild type III thermal hysteresis protein from eel pout and three mutations at residue 16. Wild type and one mutant have full activity, the other two mutants have little or no anti-freeze (thermal hysteresis) activity. The analysis reveals significant differences in the hydration structure of the ice-binding site (centered on residue 16) among four proteins. For the A16T and A16Y mutants with reduced activity, polar groups have a typical polar-like hydration. For the wild type and mutant A16C with 100% of the wild type activity, polar groups have unusual, very apolar-like hydration. In the latter case, hydrating water molecules form a more ice-like pattern of hydrogen bonding on the ice-binding face, while in the former case water–water H-bonds are more distorted and more heterogenous. Overall, the binding surface of active protein strongly enhances the water tetrahedral structure, i.e. promotes ice-like hydration. It is concluded that the specific shape, residue size and clustering of both polar/apolar groups are essential for the binding surface to recognize, and preferentially interact with nascent ice crystals forming in liquid water.