Abstract :
It is widely assumed that male competition and female choice select for elaboration of the same male traits and that fighting ability is synonymous with high quality in terms of benefits to females. Under these assumptions, females are expected to use the same traits that reflect fighting ability to choose the most dominant male, even if females are not privy to actual male-male interactions. Few studies, however, have explicitly investigated female choice in relation to male fighting ability. I conducted experiments separating the effects of male competition and female choice in a freshwater fish, the Pacific blue-eye, Pseudomugil signifer, to test whether females prefer dominant males and whether females obtain higher egg hatching success by being choosy. When females were precluded from witnessing agonistic encounters between two potential mates, they did not appear to use traits correlated with fighting ability to choose competitively superior males. However, even when females were privy to competition, witnessing male interactions did not induce a preference for dominant individuals. Lack of preference for superior fighters may be because there was no difference in hatching success between eggs guarded by dominant and subordinate males. Instead, females appeared to prefer males that spent a greater proportion of time engaged in courtship and, in so choosing, enjoyed higher egg hatching success. These results indicate that dominant males are not necessarily more attractive than subordinates nor do the former necessarily guarantee or deliver the kind of benefits that females may seek.
