Title of article :
A comparison between two analytical models that approximate notch-root elastic–plastic strain–stress components in two-phase, particle-reinforced, metal matrix composites under multiaxial cyclic loading: Theory
Author/Authors :
Gbadebo M. Owolabi، نويسنده , , Meera N.K. Singh، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
Pages :
8
From page :
910
To page :
917
Abstract :
In this paper, two analytical models for estimating surface notch-root elastic–plastic, strain–stress histories in particulate metal matrix composites (PMMCs) when subjected to multiaxial cyclic loads are presented and compared. The models are based on the concept of incremental average stress, the endochronic theory of plasticity, and modified forms of the incremental equivalent strain energy density method (ESED) and Neuberʹs rule. Each model provides a complete set of equations capable of predicting the elastic–plastic strain–stress histories at the notch root given a corresponding elastic solution. The preliminary analytical results obtained by applying the formulations to a circumferentially notched round bar show that each model can independently be used to predict the nonlinear heterogeneous behavior at the notch root in PMMC components.
Keywords :
Equivalent strain energy density (ESED) method , Endochronic theory , Notch analysis , Neuberיs rule , Particulate metal matrix composites
Journal title :
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE
Serial Year :
2006
Journal title :
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE
Record number :
1161217
Link To Document :
بازگشت