• Title of article

    Quantifying reliability uncertainty from catastrophic and margin defects: A proof of concept

  • Author/Authors

    Christine M. Anderson-Cook، نويسنده , , Stephen Crowder، نويسنده , , Aparna V. Huzurbazar، نويسنده , , John Lorio، نويسنده , , James Ringland، نويسنده , , Alyson G. Wilson، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2011
  • Pages
    13
  • From page
    1063
  • To page
    1075
  • Abstract
    We aim to analyze the effects of component level reliability data, including both catastrophic failures and margin failures, on system level reliability. While much work has been done to analyze margins and uncertainties at the component level, a gap exists in relating this component level analysis to the system level. We apply methodologies for aggregating uncertainty from component level data to quantify overall system uncertainty. We explore three approaches towards this goal, the classical Method of Moments (MOM), Bayesian, and Bootstrap methods. These three approaches are used to quantify the uncertainty in reliability for a system of mixed series and parallel components for which both pass/fail and continuous margin data are available. This paper provides proof of concept that uncertainty quantification methods can be constructed and applied to system reliability problems. In addition, application of these methods demonstrates that the results from the three fundamentally different approaches can be quite comparable.
  • Keywords
    bootstrap , Catastrophic and margins failure modes , Bayesian analysis , Method of moments , System reliability
  • Journal title
    Reliability Engineering and System Safety
  • Serial Year
    2011
  • Journal title
    Reliability Engineering and System Safety
  • Record number

    1188339