Author/Authors :
Ferreira، Jose´ V. نويسنده Centro de Estudos em Educac¸a?o, Tecnologia e Sau´de, ESTGV , , Viana، Helder نويسنده Centro de Estudos em Educac¸a?o, Tecnologia e Sau´de, ESTGV , , Esteves، Bruno نويسنده Centro de Estudos em Educac¸a?o, Tecnologia e Sau´de, ESTGV , , Cruz Lopes، Lu?´sa P. نويسنده Centro de Estudos em Educac¸a?o, Tecnologia e Sau´de, ESTGV , , Domingos، Idalina نويسنده Centro de Estudos em Educac¸a?o, Tecnologia e Sau´de, ESTGV ,
Abstract :
The residual forest biomass (RFB) sector has
been experiencing strong development at European level
and particularly in Portugal mainly due to the increase of
energy production from renewable sources. The aim of this
study is to assess the environmental impacts of eucalyptus
RFB chips production chain in Portugal. The environmental
and economic impact comparison of the processes
included in the production chain is presented as well. The
environmental impacts were calculated by the life cycle
assessment approach described in the ISO 14040 series of
standards. The production chain assessed included all
processes from eucalyptus forest until the delivery of RFB
chips at the power plant. The main conclusion of this study
is that eucalyptus wood production is the process that
presents the greatest environmental impact through the
product life cycle. Considering only emissions and depletion
of energy resources, RFB chipping is the process that
presents the higher environmental impact followed by
transport of RFB by truck and trailer and transport of RFB
by forwarder. These operations are responsible for
approximately 81 % on ‘‘Respiratory inorganic’’ and 87 %
on ‘‘Fossil fuels’’ which are the two most significant normalized
impact categories. In economic terms, the transport
of RFB by truck and trailer presents the highest cost
followed by chipping and processing of trees. These three
operations are responsible for approximately 80 % of total
costs. A sensitivity analysis showed that a 32 % increase in
the transport distance from the forest to the power plant
would cause an 8 % increase in ‘‘Climate change’’.