Title of article :
Blood substitutes: why haven’t we been more successful?
Author/Authors :
Abdu I. Alayash، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2014
Pages :
9
From page :
177
To page :
185
Abstract :
Persistent safety concerns have stalled the development of viable hemoglobin (Hb)-based oxygen carriers (HBOCs). HBOCs have several advantages over human blood, including availability, long-term storage, and lack of infectious risk. The basis of HBOC toxicity is poorly understood, however, several mechanisms have been suggested, including Hb extravasation across the blood vessel wall, scavenging of endothelial nitric oxide (NO), oversupply of oxygen, and heme-mediated oxidative side reactions. Although there are some in vitro and limited animal studies supporting these mechanisms, heme-mediated reactivity appears to provide an alternative path that can explain some of the observed pathophysiological changes. Moreover, recent mechanistic and animal studies support a role for globin and heme scavengers in controlling oxidative toxicity associated with Hb infusion.
Keywords :
Heme , Hemoglobin , Oxidative toxicity , Blood substitutes
Journal title :
Trends in Biotechnology
Serial Year :
2014
Journal title :
Trends in Biotechnology
Record number :
1233991
Link To Document :
بازگشت