• Title of article

    Relative Importance in English and Persian: Thematization or Tonic Prominence?

  • Author/Authors

    Mehrgan، Kamran نويسنده Islamic Azad University of Masjed Soleiman , , Alipour، Mohammad Reza نويسنده Tuberculosis and Lung Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IR Iran ,

  • Issue Information
    دوفصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 0 سال 2010
  • Pages
    14
  • From page
    83
  • To page
    96
  • Abstract
    There are two common ways to assign relative importance in spoken language: tonic prominence and thematization. The former is expressing the main points of information units in speech (Halliday, 1994), and the latter is putting an element at the beginning of a clause. This study explores how relative importance is realized in English and Persian. It also investigates how advanced Persian learners of English assign it in English. 20 Persian declaratives were given to 30 Persian Native Speakers (PNSs) to assign relative importance in whatever way. Results revealed that PNSs more thematize rather than use tonic prominence. Then, the English equivalents of the 20 Persian declaratives were given to 10 English Native Speakers (ENSs). Results demonstrated that ENSs thematize more too. Finally, the same English clauses were given to 20 learners of English. Contrary to expectations, results showed their greater use of tonic prominence.
  • Journal title
    Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics
  • Serial Year
    2010
  • Journal title
    Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics
  • Record number

    1242226