Title of article :
The manipulation mechanism of “push–pull” habitat management strategy and advances in its application
Author/Authors :
Zhengqun Zhang، نويسنده , , Xiaoling Sun، نويسنده , , Zongxiu Luo، نويسنده , , Yu Gao، نويسنده , , Zongmao Chen، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
Pages :
8
From page :
94
To page :
101
Abstract :
The “push–pull” habitat management strategy, as a new powerful and effective tool in integrated pest management (IPM), uses a combination of behavior-modifying stimuli to manipulate the distribution and abundance of pests and/or their natural enemies for pest control. In the “push–pull” strategy, pests are repelled or deterred away from the protected resource (push) by stimuli that disturb the host location and modulate the host become unattractive or unsuitable for the feeding and oviposition of pests. By using highly attractive stimuli, the target pests are simultaneously attracted (pull) to the specific source in which they are subsequently concentrated, facilitating their elimination and leaving the protected resource. Since stimuli usually are nontoxic, either “push” or “pull” components, the strategy is usually companied by population-reduced methods, such as using insecticides, exploiting nature enemies, and placing traps. Among them, methods of biological control are the most preferred. The “push–pull” strategies maximize efficacy of behavior-modifying stimuli through the additive and synergistic effects of integrating the use of methods for population reduction. In this review, the principles of the “push–pull” strategy were firstly described, then the potential behavior-modifying stimuli for “push” and “pull” components were introduced. The stimuli for use in “push–pull” strategies primarily include visual cues and chemical cues (synthetic or plant- or insect-derived semiochemicals). Visual stimuli, repellent and trap plants, host and non-host volatiles, insect pheromones, and antifeedants and oviposition deterrents are usually applied as the potential stimuli in the “push–pull” strategy for pest control. The stimuli are grouped as long-range stimuli and short-range stimuli. In addition, we also summarize models of “push–pull” habitat management strategy, such as agriculture, horticulture and forestry, of pest control and some successful case studies in applying of “push–pull” strategy and its potential ecological benefits. The “push–pull” technology (PPT), so far the most effective “push–pull” strategy in practice by farmers, developed for management of both stemborers and Striga hermonthica in maize-based farming system in eastern Africa were reviewed. The PPT uses an intercrop of repellent plants and border crops of attractive trap plants. Stemborer moths are effectively repelled away from the maize crop (push) by Desmodium and molasses grass, and are subsequently attracted (or trapped) to (pull) by the Napier grass and Sudan grass which emit the green leaf volatiles (GLVs) showing attractant properties. Finally, the problems in current research and future perspectives of the “push–pull” habitat management strategy are discussed in the present paper.
Keywords :
“push–pull” Habitat management strategy , Manipulation of pest population , Ecological functions , Manipulation mechanism , Behavior-modifying stimuli
Journal title :
Acta Ecologica Sinica
Serial Year :
2013
Journal title :
Acta Ecologica Sinica
Record number :
1266399
Link To Document :
بازگشت