Title of article
Conformational analysis of glutamic acid analogues as probes of glutamate receptors using molecular modelling and NMR methods. Comparison with specific agonists Original Research Article
Author/Authors
Nathalie Todeschi، نويسنده , , Josyane Gharbi-Benarous، نويسنده , , Francine Acher، نويسنده , , Valery Laure، نويسنده , , Jean-Philippe Pin، نويسنده , , Joël Bockaert، نويسنده , , Robert Azerad، نويسنده , , Jean-Pierre Girault، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1997
Pages
18
From page
335
To page
352
Abstract
The activity of five glutamic acid analogues substituted in position 3 or 4 by a methyl (3T, 3E, 4T, and 4E) or a methylene group (4M) has been examined at one cloned Glu receptor subtype, MGluR1. These analogues interact with glutamate receptors of the central nervous system, especially the ligand 4T [(2S,4S)-4-methylglutamic acid] at the metabotropic glutamate receptor mGluR1. It was observed that only the 4T isomer is as potent an agonist as glutamic acid, whereas other isomers are less active. Furthermore, 4E [(2S,4R)-4-methylglutamic acid] exhibited an exceptional selectivity for the KA ionotropic receptor subtype while 4M [(2S)-4-methyleneglutamic acid] was active at the NMDA receptors. These molecules represent suitable tools among a population of similar glutamate analogues for a classical structure-function relationship study. We have undertaken a conformational analysis by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy and molecular modelling of these molecules. Hetero- and homonuclear coupling constants were measured in order to assign the diastereotopic methylene protons at C(3) or C(4), and used for comparison in molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The hydrogen-bonding possibility, steric effects or electrostatic interactions may be a considerable influence in stabilizing a conformational population in D2O solution. The conformations may be grouped by the two backbone torsion angles, χ1 [α-CO−2-C(2)-C(3)-C(4)] and χ2 [+NC(2)-C(3)-C(4)-γCO−2] and by the two characteristic distances between the potentially active functional groups, αN???—γCO−2 (d2) and αCO−2—γCO−2 (d2). The conformational preferences in solution of 4T, 4E and (3T, 3E, 4M) are discussed in the light of the physical features known for a specific metabotropic agonist (ACPD) and specific ionotropic agonists (KA) and (NMDA), respectively.
Journal title
Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry
Serial Year
1997
Journal title
Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry
Record number
1301087
Link To Document