The unexpected reactions of [RuCl3(2mqn)NO]− (H2mqn=2-methyl-8-quinolinol) with 2-chloro-8-quinolinol (H2cqn) and of [RuCl(2cqn)(2mqn)NO] on photoirradiation

The reaction of [RuCl3(2mqn)NO]− (H2mqn=2-methyl-8-quinolinol) with 2-chloro-8-quinolinol (H2cqn) afforded cis-1 [RuCl(2cqn)(2mqn)NO] (the oxygen of 2cqn is trans to the NO) (complex 1), cis-1 [RuCl(2cqn)(2mqn)NO] (the oxygen of 2mqn is trans to the NO) (complex 2) and a 1:1 mixture of cis-2 [RuCl(2cqn)(2mqn)NO] (the oxygen of 2mqn is trans to the NO) and cis-2 [RuCl(2cqn)(2mqn)NO] (the oxygen of 2cqn is trans to the NO) (complex 3). The reaction was compared with that of [RuCl3(2mqn)NO]− with 8-quinolinol (Hqn) or 5-chloro-8-quinolinol (H5cqn). Photoirradiation reaction of complex 1 at room temperature in deaerated CH2Cl2 in the presence of NO gave trans-[RuCl(2cqn)(2mqn)NO] (the Cl is trans to the NO) and complex 2 with recovery of complex 1. The reaction was contrasted with that of cis-1 [RuCl(qn)(2mqn)NO] or cis-1 [RuCl(5cqn)(2mqn)NO]. The crystal structure of complex 1 was determined by X-ray diffraction. The reactions were examined under consideration of atomic charge of the phenolato oxygen in 8-quinolinol and its derivatives calculated at the restricted Hartree–Fock/6-311G** level.