Title of article :
Effect of external gamma irradiation on dissolution of the spent UO2 fuel matrix
Author/Authors :
Jégou، نويسنده , , C. and Muzeau، نويسنده , , B. and Broudic، نويسنده , , V. and Peuget، نويسنده , , S. and Poulesquen، نويسنده , , A. and Roudil، نويسنده , , D. and Corbel، نويسنده , , C.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Abstract :
Leaching experiments were performed on UO2 pellets doped with alpha-emitters (238/239Pu) and on spent fuel, in the presence of an external gamma irradiation source (A60Co = 260 Ci, D ˙ γ = 650 Gy h−1). The effects of α, β, γ radiation, the fuel chemistry and the nature of the cover gas (aerated or Ar + 4%H2) on water radiolysis and on oxidizing dissolution of the UO2 matrix are quantified and discussed. For the doped UO2 pellets, the nature of the cover gas clearly has a major role in the effect of gamma radiolysis. The uranium dissolution rate in an aerated medium is 83 mg m−2 d−1 compared with only 6 mg m−2 d−1 in Ar + 4%H2. The rate drop is accompanied by a reduction of about four orders of magnitude in the hydrogen peroxide concentrations in the homogeneous solution. The uranium dissolution rates also underestimate the matrix alteration rate because of major precipitation phenomena at the UO2 pellet surface. The presence of studtite in particular was demonstrated in aerated media; this is consistent with the measured H2O2 concentrations (1.2 × 10−4 mol L−1). For spent fuel, the presence of fission products (Cs and Sr), matrix alteration tracers, allowed us to determine the alteration rates under external gamma irradiation. The fission product release rates were higher by a factor of 5–10 than those of the actinides (80–90% of the actinides precipitated on the surface of the fragments) and also depended to a large extent on the nature of the cover gas. No significant effect of the fuel chemistry compared with UO2 was observed on uranium dissolution and H2O2 production in the presence of the 60Co source in aerated conditions. Conversely, in Ar + 4%H2 the fuel self-irradiation field cannot be disregarded since the H2O2 concentrations drop by only three orders of magnitude compared with UO2.
Journal title :
Journal of Nuclear Materials
Journal title :
Journal of Nuclear Materials