Understanding the stability, electronic and molecular structure of some copper(III) complexes containing alkyl and non alkyl ligands: Insights from DFT calculations

DFT calculations have been performed for some Cu(III)-alkyl complexes. Complexes 1–19 were optimized to the square planar (sq) geometry and observed no imaginary frequencies. Although formally copper adopts d8 configuration (Cu(III)) in all the complexes, the Natural Population Analysis (NPA) revealed that the copper actually in d10 (Cu(I)) configuration, Bond order calculation suggested that the Cu(III)–Ettrans bond gets more bond order in the presence of poor π-acidic co-ligand (probe ligand). Relatively smaller bond order was calculated for Cu(III)–Mecis bond than Cu(III)–Ettrans bond and therefore Cu(III)–Ettrans bond is the strongest bond in all the complexes. Calculated less Chemical hardness (η) of complexes 1–19 suggested that all these complexes are less stable in nature. Energy Decomposition Analysis (EDA) revealed that the Cu(III)–Ettrans bond is relatively more stable than the Cu(III)–Mecis and Cu(III)–L (L = co-ligand/probe ligand) bonds. And also the Cu(III)–alkyl (Cu(III)–Mecis and Cu(III)–Ettrans) bond in complexes 1–17 is more of ionic in nature. However, Cu(III)–Ettrans bond is relatively more ionic than Cu(III)–Mecis bond.