Author/Authors :
Munsters، نويسنده , , Carolien C.B.M. and van den Broek، نويسنده , , Jan and van Weeren، نويسنده , , René and Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan، نويسنده , , Marianne M.، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
The aim of this study was to monitor the fitness level of young Friesian horses and to assess whether fitness data are predictive for final performance score and whether familial aggregation of response to training could be detected. Sixty-six young Friesian horses, the offspring of six different stallions (A, B, C, D, E and F), underwent a 7-week performance test. The horses were given a performance score for their ability for dressage (in weeks 5 and 7; 0–110 points) and were evaluated for fitness using standardised exercise tests (SETs) at the beginning (week 2, SET-I) and the end (week 6, SET-II) of the period. Heart rate (HR, beats/min) was measured in both SETs, and plasma lactate concentration (LA, mmol/L) was measured only in SET-II.
s of the horses improved moderately but significantly between SET-I and SET-II (P = 0.015). There was a large heterogeneity in responsiveness to training; some horses were high responders, whereas others were non- or low responders. There was a familial aggregation of HR canter-1 response to training (P = 0.039), while the HR of stallion C’s offspring decreased significantly more than those of stallions A (P = 0.09), D (P = 0.013) and F (P = 0.009). Horses that were reluctant to exercise did not differ in HR or LA concentrations compared to those that completed the SET, which may have been a sign of overreaching. HR had no predictive value for the performance score, but horses that did not reach the anaerobic threshold in SET-II scored significantly better (73.8 ± 5.6 points) than horses that did not (69.9 ± 5.9 points, P = 0.025). The findings demonstrate for the first time in the horse a familial aggregation of HR response to training, as has been reported previously in humans. Familial aggregation suggests a genetic influence on the effect of training on fitness in horses. HR could not predict final performance score, but LA concentrations during SET-II were predictive.
Keywords :
Friesian horse , heritability , Response to training , Family lines , Performance