Title of article :
Microstructure, hardness, corrosion resistance and porcelain shear bond strength comparison between cast and hot pressed CoCrMo alloy for metal–ceramic dental restorations
Author/Authors :
Henriques، نويسنده , , B. and Soares، نويسنده , , D. and Silva، نويسنده , , F.S.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2012
Pages :
10
From page :
83
To page :
92
Abstract :
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the microstructure, hardness, corrosion resistance and metal–porcelain bond strength of a CoCrMo dental alloy obtained by two routes, cast and hot pressing. s: CoCrMo alloy substrates were obtained by casting and hot pressing. Substrates’ microstructure was examined by the means of Optical Microscopy (OM) and by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS). Hardness tests were performed in a microhardness indenter. The electrochemical behavior of substrates was investigated through potentiodynamic tests in a saline solution (8g NaCl/L). Substrates were bonded to dental porcelain and metal–porcelain bond strength was assessed by the means of a shear test performed in a universal test machine (crosshead speed: 0.5 mm/min) until fracture. Fractured surfaces as well as undestroyed interface specimens were examined with Stereomicroscopy and SEM-EDS. Data was analyzed with Shapiro-Wilk test to test the assumption of normality. The t-test ( p < 0.05 ) was used to compare shear bond strength results. s: Cast specimens exhibited dendritic microstructures whereas hot pressed specimens exhibited a typical globular microstructure with a second phase spread through the matrix. The hardness registered for hot pressed substrates was greater than that of cast specimens, 438±24HV/1 and 324±8HV/1, respectively. Hot pressed substrates showed better corrosion properties than cast ones, i.e. higher OCP; higher corrosion potential (Ecorr) and lower current densities (icorr). No significant difference was found ( p < 0.05 ) in metal–ceramic bond strength between cast (116.5±6.9 MPa) and hot pressed (114.2±11.9 MPa) substrates. The failure type analysis revealed an adhesive failure for all specimens. icance: Hot pressed products arise as an alternative to cast products in dental prosthetics, as they impart enhanced mechanical and electrochemical properties to prostheses without compromising the metal–ceramic bond strength.
Keywords :
HOT PRESSING , CoCrMo alloy , Dental restoration , Shear bond strength , Porcelain , Corrosion
Journal title :
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Serial Year :
2012
Journal title :
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Record number :
1405409
Link To Document :
بازگشت