Title of article :
Science versus design; comparable, contrastive or conducive?
Author/Authors :
Verkerke، نويسنده , , Gijsbertus J. and van der Houwen، نويسنده , , Eduard B. and Broekhuis، نويسنده , , Anton A. and Bursa، نويسنده , , Jiri and Catapano، نويسنده , , Gerardo and McCullagh، نويسنده , , Paul and Mottaghy، نويسنده , , Khosrow and Niederer، نويسنده , , Peter and Reilly، نويسنده , , Richard and Rogalewicz، نويسنده , , Vladimir and Segers، نويسنده , , Patrick and Verdonschot، نويسنده , , Nico، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
Pages :
7
From page :
195
To page :
201
Abstract :
Science and design are two completely separated areas of expertise with their own specialists. Science analyses the existing world to create new knowledge, design uses existing knowledge to create a new world. This tunnel-vision mentality and narrow-minded approach is dangerous for problem solving, where a broad view on potential solutions is required to realise a high-quality answer on the defined problem. te that design benefits from scientific methods, resulting in a more effective design process and in better products, while science benefits from a design approach, resulting in more efficient and effective results. Our philosophy is illustrated using examples from the field of biomedical engineering. ethods can benefit tremendously from each other. By applying scientific methods, superior choices will be made in the design process. With design, more accurate, effective and efficient science will be performed.
Keywords :
multidisciplinarity , methodical design , engineering education , Specialisation
Journal title :
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Serial Year :
2013
Journal title :
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Record number :
1405961
Link To Document :
بازگشت