Prevalence and correlates of the proposed DSM-5 diagnosis of Chronic Depressive Disorder

Context aft proposal to add Chronic Depressive Disorder to DSM-5 will combine DSM-IV Dysthymic Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder, with chronic specifier, into a single diagnosis. ive jective of this study is to estimate the prevalence and correlates of the proposed DSM-5 diagnosis of Chronic Depressive Disorder using unit record data from the 2007 Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. ary analysis of a nationally representative household survey. g and rural census tracts. ipants dividual between the ages of 16 and 85 years from 8841 households was interviewed for the survey. utcome measure me prevalence estimates for chronic and non-chronic depression were determined using data from the World Health Organizationʹs Composite International Diagnostic Interview, version 3.0 (WMH-CIDI 3.0). s c depression of at least two yearsʹ duration had a lifetime prevalence of 4.6% (95% CI: 3.9–5.3%) and was found in 29.4% (95% CI: 25.6–33.3%) of individuals with a lifetime depressive disorder. Higher rates of psychiatric co-morbidity (OR = 1.42; 95% CI = 1.26–1.61), older age (OR = 1.04; 95% CI = 1.02–1.05), a younger age of onset (OR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.95–0.98) and more frequent episodes of depression (OR = 1.75; 95% CI = 1.07–2.86) were found to be significant correlates of chronic depression. The first episode of depression for individuals with chronic depression often developed after the death of someone close (OR = 2.38; 95% CI 1.16–5.79). sions c depression is highly prevalent among community-residing persons and has a set of correlates that discriminate it from non-chronic depression. The distinction between chronic and non-chronic depression proposed for DSM-5, in the form of Chronic Depressive Disorder, seems to be warranted.