Refining a complex diagnostic construct: Subtyping Dysthymia with the Shedler–Westen Assessment Procedure-II

AbstractObjective ght to determine whether meaningful subtypes of Dysthymic patients could be identified when grouping them by similar personality profiles. om, national sample of psychiatrists and clinical psychologists (n=1201) described a randomly selected current patient with personality pathology using the descriptors in the Shedler–Westen Assessment Procedure‐II (SWAP‐II), completed assessments of patientsʹ adaptive functioning, and provided DSM-IV Axis I and II diagnoses. s lied Q-factor cluster analyses to those patients diagnosed with Dysthymic Disorder. Four clusters were identified—High Functioning, Anxious/Dysphoric, Emotionally Dysregulated, and Narcissistic. These factor scores corresponded with a priori hypotheses regarding diagnostic comorbidity and level of adaptive functioning. We compared these groups to diagnostic constructs described and empirically identified in the past literature. sions sults converge with past and current ideas about the ways in which chronic depression and personality are related and offer an enhanced means by which to understand a heterogeneous diagnostic category that is empirically grounded and clinically useful.