Title of article :
Assessment of global and local meshless methods based on collocation with radial basis functions for parabolic partial differential equations in three dimensions
Author/Authors :
Yao، نويسنده , , Guangming and Siraj-ul-Islam and ?arler، نويسنده , , Bo?idar، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2012
Pages :
9
From page :
1640
To page :
1648
Abstract :
A comparison of the performance of the global and the local radial basis function collocation meshless methods for three dimensional parabolic partial differential equations is performed in the present paper. The methods are structured with multiquadrics radial basis functions. The time-stepping is performed in a fully explicit, fully implicit and Crank–Nicolson ways. Uniform and non-uniform node arrangements have been used. A three-dimensional diffusion–reaction equation is used for testing with the Dirichlet and mixed Dirichlet–Neumann boundary conditions. The global methods result in discretization matrices with the number of unknowns equal to the number of the nodes. The local methods are in the present paper based on seven-noded influence domains, and reduce to discretization matrices with seven unknowns for each node in case of the explicit methods or a sparse matrix with the dimension of the number of the nodes and seven non-zero row entries in case of the implicit method. The performance of the methods is assessed in terms of accuracy and efficiency. The outcome of the comparison is as follows. The local methods show superior efficiency and accuracy, especially for the problems with Dirichlet boundary conditions. Global methods are efficient and accurate only in cases with small amount of nodes. For large amount of nodes, they become inefficient and run into ill-conditioning problems. Local explicit method is very accurate, however, sensitive to the node position distribution, and becomes sensitive to the shape parameter of the radial basis functions when the mixed boundary conditions are used. Performance of the local implicit method is comparatively better than the others when a larger number of nodes and mixed boundary conditions are used. The paper represents an extension of our recently made similar study in two dimensions.
Keywords :
parabolic partial differential equation , Explicit scheme , Implicit scheme , Crank–Nicolson scheme , RBF collocation method , Meshless method
Journal title :
Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements
Serial Year :
2012
Journal title :
Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements
Record number :
1446123
Link To Document :
بازگشت